GraphQL vs REST: A Practical Comparison

Explore similarities and differences between GraphQL and REST. Learn which API style suits your web development needs best with examples and practical advice.


Back to Home

Table of content

Introduction

API design is crucial in modern web development. Two prominent API styles—GraphQL and REST—offer different approaches to querying and manipulating data. But which one is right for your project? Let’s explore a practical comparison between GraphQL and REST, examining their key concepts, pros, cons, and use cases.

Understanding REST

What is REST?

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. It uses standard HTTP methods—GET, POST, PUT, DELETE—to perform operations on resources represented by URLs.

Key Concepts

  • Resources: Identified by URIs (e.g., /users/1).
  • Stateless: Each request contains all the information needed for the server to fulfill it.
  • HTTP Methods: GET (retrieve), POST (create), PUT (update), DELETE (remove).
  • Response Formats: Usually JSON or XML.

Sample REST API Request

// Fetch a user
GET /users/1

Understanding GraphQL

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a query language and server-side runtime developed by Facebook. It offers a flexible way to interact with data by allowing clients to specify exactly what information they need.

Key Concepts

  • Single Endpoint: All queries go to the same endpoint, often /graphql.
  • Strong Typing: Data structured by types and schemas.
  • Flexible Queries: Clients request exactly what they need—no more, no less.
  • Introspection: Clients can query the schema for available types and queries.

Sample GraphQL Query

{
  user(id: 1) {
    id
    name
    email
  }
}

GraphQL vs REST: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature REST GraphQL
Endpoints Multiple (per resource) Single (all queries/mutations)
Data Fetching Returns fixed data structure Client defines response shape
Over/Under Fetching Common (extra or missing fields) Rare (fetch only what you need)
Versioning Often uses versioned URLs No versioning, evolve types/fields
Caching Easy with HTTP caching More challenging, custom solutions

Advantages and Disadvantages

REST Pros

  • Well-established standard
  • Easy to cache responses
  • Works seamlessly with HTTP

REST Cons

  • Over/under fetching data
  • Numerous endpoints
  • Rigid structure

GraphQL Pros

  • Single endpoint
  • Clients fetch exactly what they need
  • Strong type system
  • Introspection and self-documentation

GraphQL Cons

  • Complexity in setup
  • Challenging to cache
  • Risk of performance issues with overly complex queries

When to Use REST

  • Simple, standardized CRUD APIs
  • Public-facing services with clear versioning needs
  • Projects relying on HTTP-level caching

When to Use GraphQL

  • Complex relational data or multiple clients (web, mobile)
  • Rapidly evolving frontend requirements
  • Needing precise control over API responses

Conclusion

Both GraphQL and REST have unique strengths and shortcomings. REST is ideal for straightforward, well-cached APIs, while GraphQL excels in complex, data-driven applications. Your choice should be guided by your project’s complexity, performance requirements, and team expertise.

Further Reading

API
API design
Backend
Frontend
GraphQL
REST
Web Development